[nndl] The Polls are Open - Here are the proposition in simple lingo - please vote

Dear Neighbors....
The Poll Workers at the Travis County Tax office are very curious if anyone will vote in this important election - changing our state constitution. This week from 7 am -7pm you can vote there, help shape this process, and use your citizen' right. Be informed, be active.

Below are the propositions on the ballot in lingo I understand. If you want I have a 28 page doc that
provides greater detail I can send to you, just let me know. There is a Voter's Guide, by the League of Women Voters  of Texas available at Travis County tax office, as well.
-MarthaOn 10/12/09 7:57 PM, "M Ward" < [at]
> wrote:



Get Ready to Vote - from Kirk Watson, Texas Senator
October 12, 2009
Every
other November – the ones in odd-numbered years, when there are a lot
fewer good-looking politicians calling each other names – Texas voters
go to the polls to amend the constitution. For those of you who are new
to the process: yes, we Texans have our own constitution .  And no, that doesn’t mean we’ve seceded from the United States. 101: The
are generally considered to be important.  One way you can tell that
the founders thought they were important is they take precedence over
every other law the legislature passes.  Both the Senate and the
have to approve them by a two-thirds margin.  Then, voters have to
ratify them. Even so, some of the amendments are relatively
straight-forward and noncontroversial proposals that fix or clarify
other parts of the constitution.  (Our constitution is really, really
long  – the copy I've been using is almost 200 pages – and it covers numerous facets of state government; it’s so not like the , with its
puny seven articles and 27 amendments.) But other amendments are critically important to , its people, and its future. On November 3 , there will be a few in both categories .
The Big Ones
A half-dozen propositions  – touching on top-flight universities, property tax appraisals, and private property rights – really stand out this time.
Proposition 4
would dedicate more than $400 million we already have to turn existing campuses into “tier-one” public research
universities – academic and economic powerhouses on par with and University
.
The money would help these existing institutions pay for groundbreaking
research, state-of-the-art facilities, and internationally renowned
faculty, allowing them to attract even brighter students and spin off
technologies that will create new companies and industries. I’ll have
more to say about this one next week. But there’s no secret that
increasing the number of top-tier universities has been among my
biggest priorities
 since I took office nearly three years ago.  I’m very excited that
Texas will have the chance to take such a big step toward this critical
goal next month. Three other very significant initiatives are
Propositions 2, 3, and 5.
 All of these would protect property
taxpayers by setting out new standards on appraisals. Proposition 2 requires that a Texan’s – the home where they live, in other words – can be appraised only as a home.  This stops from appraising a homeowner’s property based on the value that it’d have as, say, a shopping mall or office building. [I will vote Yes! on #2 -as Greg suggests below-MW]
Proposition 3 strengthens state oversight of a appraisal board’s practices and procedures. Hopefully, this will reduce the wide variations in the way appraisal districts set .
And Proposition 5
allows adjoining appraisal districts or similar entities to consolidate
their review board functions so they can be more efficient. Finally, Proposition 11 builds on a current law limiting the ability of the state, or any other jurisdiction, to condemn and acquire property for through the
use of .
 It also would make clear that while some jurisdictions could still
condemn land for “public use,” that term wouldn’t apply to an .
 And it would require a two-thirds vote of the state House and Senate
before the legislature could grant the power of eminent domain to a
Texas entity.
The ones that are . . . less big
That
leaves another half-dozen amendments on your ballot November 3.  These
measures probably don’t touch the lives of as many Texans as the ones I
outlined above.  But they’re still important changes for the people who
need them, and they can’t happen without .
Proposition 1
would allow the legislature to let cities and counties issue debt in
order to acquire buffer areas, infrastructure right-of-way, and open
space next to military installations.
Proposition 6
would let the Veterans’ Land Board issue more debt than it does now to help Texas veterans acquire land or get a .
Proposition 7
would clarify that members of the Texas State Guard (or similar groups) could hold civil offices such as or . Proposition 8
would clarify that the state can contribute money, property or other
resources for a veteran’s hospital.  Most immediately, this would allow
the state to help build a in the , as required by a law that took effect earlier this year.
Proposition 9

would strengthen the state’s open beaches law by putting it in the
constitution and clarifying that the public has the unrestricted right
to use, and get to and from, public beaches.  It also says beaches
would continue to belong to the public, even if storms or erosion move
the beach under houses or other buildings. And Proposition 10 would lengthen
the term of emergency services district board members from two to four
years. In my view, all of these are good, reasonable amendments.  I
voted for them in the Senate, and I encourage you to learn about them  and vote for them on November 3.
( or this last week of October at the Travis County Tax office on Airport

--- On Sat, 10/24/09, Capsaisin < [at] > wrote:


From: Capsaisin < [at] >

Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 9:24 AM

 

I was also concerned about Proposition 2 and the all-caps, trumpeted message:

"THIS IS A MOVE TO START TAXING TEXAS RESIDENTIAL
HOMEOWNERS!! !"

So I did my own research, read the language of the bill, and followed up with an analysis (personal) and query (direct) to a friend who works in the TX State Capitol.

I don't know what the source of the "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt" (FUD) about Prop 2 is coming from, but I truly believe there is nothing wrong with requiring TCAD (or other appraisal districts) to value my property as a homestead.  I live with two apartment complexes across the street, one a few plats down, and am concerned that TCAD could (is) valuing my property (land value) on the basis of what it could be sold to a developer for (in order to build more apartment complexes).Some details from a representative that's trustworthy (IMHO)

http://www.house. state.tx. us/news/release. php?id=2910

"Currently, homes are appraised on the basis of their "highest and best
use." Appraisal districts using this standard may appraise a home at a
value based on its commercial potential rather than its actual use as a
home. For example, a home located near a shopping center may be
appraised as a retail shop. Residences near condominium complexes may
be appraised as commercial property"

So I say, vote YES on Proposition 2.  I like my home, and don't need to be priced out via "highest and best use" property tax (any faster than is currently happening).Respectfully,

--Greg

 

__



 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.