strip centers

Oy. That Howard's property in its current condition is a real problem
for our neighborhood.

A strip center would almost surely not have a primary entrance at the
south end.

That is the main issue that I and most of the people opposed to it have.

The south entrance/exit brings a lot of traffic through the hood.
Especially since this is
residential. People learn the paths and shortcuts and ways to avoid
the lights.

I posted a breakdown of some key aspects of the prelim traffic study
Endeavor presented on this political site:

Good points, Patrick.

I am just so fascinated about all this discussion (like the ones about the
hangar) - about what "we" should do with the property at old Howard's and old
Parkers.

To my knowledge "we" have not purchased that property (just like we did not own
the hangar).

If/when Endeavor passes on the Howard/Parker property (I assume they will not go
through with buying the property at this point) the property will go back on the

jody horton wrote:
> Lately strip centers seem to have been vilified by Endeavor - and all of us.
>
> So I thought I would stick up for them.
>

If traffic is the major concern (this was the primary argument against
the Endeavor variance after all), then the problem with a strip center
is that strip centers generally generate more traffic than the Endeavor
proposal would.

Yes, some strip centers can be cool, but the price of this property

Lately strip centers seem to have been vilified by Endeavor - and all of us.